Sunday, June 27, 2010

Choosing the Best Lawyer for Your Small Business

If you own a small business, it is important to choose the best lawyer to represent the interests of your small business. A strategic business lawyer can help you with your start-up and ongoing strategies, help you with critical business planning, review leases and contracts, and negotiate for you. Your attorney must help you comply with a myriad of regulations from employment issues to zoning.

You must research carefully to find just the right legal expert. You do not want a lawyer who does not take an interest in or learn about your business. You can ask accountants, bankers, other small-business owners, and friends for referrals. You can check with your state Bar association to find out if they have attorneys who specialize in representing small businesses. You can ask for and check the lawyer's references. You can also look in the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory.

You should not make your final decision based on referrals or other sources. You must interview the lawyers that you believe would suit your business. You should be aware that many attorneys charge a consultation fee of $150 or more. That is a small amount to pay to be sure that the lawyer you choose can meet your needs and will really do a job representing your business.

The following are a few points to keep in mind when you interview the attorney. First, be sure that the lawyer does not rush through the interview and gives you his or her full, undivided attention. Be sure that the lawyer you choose understands your business and your industry including its processes. The lawyer you choose must be willing to take as much time as needed to explain every legal issue that may arise and its consequences. Finally, the lawyer must be available to you whenever you need help, and it is not acceptable for the lawyer to turn you over to the legal assistant after your retainer is paid.

There may be other things that are important to you, and you should not hesitate to demand the type and quality of service that you deserve.

Copyright 2006. Indigo Business Solutions is a registered trade name.




Jo Ann Joy, CEO, www.IndigoBusinessSolutions.net
Phone (602) 663-7007, Fax (602) 324-7582
The future of your business starts here.

For more information about these and other important business topics and for legal consultation, please visit our website at http://www.IndigoBusinessSolutions.net

automobile donations Adwards Bill Consolidate

Friday, June 18, 2010

High Court Wants to Stop Judicial Process Delays

One US Chief Justice warned thirty trial judges and attorneys who are currently working with workman compensation criminal cases. The courts weren't designed for the lawyer's personal use to play with individual or public rights, according to the Chief Justice. Through this very unusual format, the judge asked that the lawyers and judges stop delaying justice.

The chief justice did not single out anyone in particular. The conference order was issued after the attorney general blamed some judges for making the state's investigation and prosecution more difficult in alleged workers compensation crimes. Lawyers soon fought back, saying that the attorney general's comments were entirely out of order and uncalled for.

The conference goal, according to the chief justice, is to ensure the speedy application of justice. Mistakes made during implementation should also be avoided. He said each lawyer and judge should give worker compensation related cases top priority, and the courts should put them first on their calendars. Special jury terms were called for to help speed things up.

According to one lawyer at the conference, the validity of the order was in question because it didn't have three of the five sitting justices? signatures. This particular order, which also enacted a gag order, only had one chief justice's signature. Comments made in the public arena, and not in court, that are specifically made to change the public opinion about someone, do nothing to help justice. This site teaches you about

Judges and lawyers were reminded that they had vowed to ignore any personal differences they may have while in court. Such issues should be taken to the grievance committees, which have been created for this purpose, according to the judge. Judges were reminded of the importance of a speedy trial, as provided for in our constitution. They were also told that due process must be protected. There were many questions that were asked from the attendees, but the chief justice made it apparent that this was neither the time or place for airing grievances about previous events. The right arena would look into those problems.

One attorney wanted to make sure the difference between media reporting and the public commenting by a prosecutor was clearly seen. His client had been indicted by a grand jury. The lawyer said our first amendment to the constitution gave the media the right to report, but the Canons of Ethics made public comments by the prosecution inexcusable. Another lawyer, whose client used to administrate a workers compensation division, said he had not violated the gag order, but rather had taken legal steps to protect his client.

When the counsel for one indicted lawyer stated that he wouldn't be giving any of this client's rights away, he was just trying to pick a fight. Other counsels for indicted lawyers worried that sometimes silence is construed to mean an admission of the party's guilt, though this is not necessarily the case. There were also statements made by another lawyer claiming that there was a slowly rising rate of worker's compensation case publicity. Yet another counselor reported his client is facing terrible effects from the negative publicity in his case.




As a person looking for personal injury lawyers melbourne you should visit that site.

loan

Friday, June 11, 2010

Are Unemployment Benefits Taxable?

Jobs have been fleeting the last few years. Fortunately, unemployment benefits have provided a safety net for many people. Most people don't realize that the taxability of these benefits is an issue.

The Great Recession has move through practically every financial industry and the end result has been huge increases in unemployment numbers. As I am writing this, the unemployment rate stands at just under 10 percent. That is staggering. It means roughly 1 in 10 people are without a job. Many others are working part time or reduced hours and thus are not counted as unemployed. All and all, it is a fairly dire situation and one can only hope business picks up and jobs start being created.

If we learned anything in the Great Depression, it was that certain safety nets needed to be built into society. Unemployment benefits are one such program and have really made a difference during the current Great Recession. Alas, tax is an issue with anything involving money in America. The same goes for this source.

Are unemployment benefits taxable? Sadly, the answer is yes. The IRS considers the payments you get as a form of wage replacement. This results in them be classified as income. You know what that means. Income is taxable. This raises the rather odd scenario where a person who needs help because they have no job must somehow pay tax out of their earnings.

So, what do you do? Well, you can file out and file a W-4 Form. It asks the government to do withholdings from the benefits so you don't owe at the end of the year. Alternatively, you can pay quarterly estimated taxes. In either situation, you are going to receive less money and that is going to hurt when you need it most.

Are unemployment benefits taxable? Yes. Sadly so.




Thomas Ajava writes for CorporationTaxLawyerIndiana.com - find a corporation tax lawyer in Indiana near you.

booth lasik