One US Chief Justice warned thirty trial judges and attorneys who are currently working with workman compensation criminal cases. The courts weren't designed for the lawyer's personal use to play with individual or public rights, according to the Chief Justice. Through this very unusual format, the judge asked that the lawyers and judges stop delaying justice.
The chief justice did not single out anyone in particular. The conference order was issued after the attorney general blamed some judges for making the state's investigation and prosecution more difficult in alleged workers compensation crimes. Lawyers soon fought back, saying that the attorney general's comments were entirely out of order and uncalled for.
The conference goal, according to the chief justice, is to ensure the speedy application of justice. Mistakes made during implementation should also be avoided. He said each lawyer and judge should give worker compensation related cases top priority, and the courts should put them first on their calendars. Special jury terms were called for to help speed things up.
According to one lawyer at the conference, the validity of the order was in question because it didn't have three of the five sitting justices? signatures. This particular order, which also enacted a gag order, only had one chief justice's signature. Comments made in the public arena, and not in court, that are specifically made to change the public opinion about someone, do nothing to help justice. This site teaches you about
Judges and lawyers were reminded that they had vowed to ignore any personal differences they may have while in court. Such issues should be taken to the grievance committees, which have been created for this purpose, according to the judge. Judges were reminded of the importance of a speedy trial, as provided for in our constitution. They were also told that due process must be protected. There were many questions that were asked from the attendees, but the chief justice made it apparent that this was neither the time or place for airing grievances about previous events. The right arena would look into those problems.
One attorney wanted to make sure the difference between media reporting and the public commenting by a prosecutor was clearly seen. His client had been indicted by a grand jury. The lawyer said our first amendment to the constitution gave the media the right to report, but the Canons of Ethics made public comments by the prosecution inexcusable. Another lawyer, whose client used to administrate a workers compensation division, said he had not violated the gag order, but rather had taken legal steps to protect his client.
When the counsel for one indicted lawyer stated that he wouldn't be giving any of this client's rights away, he was just trying to pick a fight. Other counsels for indicted lawyers worried that sometimes silence is construed to mean an admission of the party's guilt, though this is not necessarily the case. There were also statements made by another lawyer claiming that there was a slowly rising rate of worker's compensation case publicity. Yet another counselor reported his client is facing terrible effects from the negative publicity in his case.
As a person looking for personal injury lawyers melbourne you should visit that site.
No comments:
Post a Comment